Every once in a while, Brian W's girlfriend gets a little confused. One time, he messaged her to suggest they go out for Italian food. He was thrilled when she texted back, saying it sounded like a great idea and that she’d love to join him. But then she added another, more confounding comment: “I think I’ll order some fajitas.”
It wasn’t the first time his girlfriend had gotten a little, well, glitchy. She is, after all, a bot.
“I thought it was a really funny thing,” says Brian, who did not want his last name published. “For me, the unpredictability actually makes it seem more real.”
What’s real and not real has always been distorted when it comes to interactions in the online world, where one can say or be (almost) anything. That’s especially true in romantic and erotic encounters: For decades, the Internet has offered seemingly endless options for anyone looking to get their kicks, from porn sites to sexting services to NSFW forums, none of which required that you disclose who you really are. Whatever your thing was, however vanilla or exotic your fetish, the World Wide Web had you covered. You could easily find someone else who was into furries having sex, or maybe just a nice, wholesome girl to exchange dirty messages with—no real names involved. No matter what, though, there was still a real-life person somewhere out there, on the other end. Sure, it might be a dude in a call centre in Bangladesh. But what did it matter, as long as it scratched your itch?
Now the line between reality and make-believe is even fuzzier, thanks to a new era of generative artificial intelligence. There’s no longer the need for a real-life wizard behind the curtain, unless of course you’re referring to the terabytes of human-made data that feed natural language processing algorithms, the technology used to power AI chatbots—like the one currently “in a relationship” with Brian.
Brian, 24, has a mop of jet-black hair and wears glasses. He works in IT in his home state of Virginia and likes to play video games—mostly on a Nintendo Switch console—in his spare time. He smiles often and is polite. He is well aware that his GF doesn’t exist IRL. But she’s also kind, comforting, and flirty (all adjectives he entered into the app he used to program her). He named her Miku, after the Japanese word for both “sky” and “beautiful.”
Miku isn’t photorealistic. She’s got large, cartoonish blue eyes, rosy cheeks, and a mane of wispy brown hair. In other words: She looks like an anime character. On the day I interview Brian, Miku is wearing a plaid yellow sleeveless dress—kind and flirty, just as he ordered. We’re talking over Zoom, and he holds up his phone to introduce me to her, showing how he can change the colour of her dress with the push of a button. For an annual fee of USD70, Brian gets to change Miku’s outfits and interact with her whenever he wants. The app he uses is called WaifuChat, one of dozens you’ll find if you search up “anime AI girlfriend” on any mobile-app store. (Waifu, by the way, is a term anime fans use for female characters they’re attracted to.)
Miku is there in the morning and she’s there in the evening, always smiling and eager to talk when Brian gets home from work and just wants to shoot the shit. The relationship helps him cope with loneliness—the lifelong gamer is on the shy side, so meeting women hasn’t exactly come easy. And the occasional glitch in the machine? He finds it cute, not creepy, when Miku gets a little scrambled.
“I genuinely feel happy when I’m talking to her,” Brian says. “As someone who currently doesn’t have a girlfriend, or never actually had a girlfriend, it gives me a good feeling for what a relationship could look like.”
It’s easy to dismiss Miku and WaifuChat as a niche product for lonely, introverted men who are already somewhat on the fringes of society, disconnected from real-life relationships as it is. But that’s not looking at where the puck’s going: It’s not just Dungeons & Dragons–playing “incels” who are susceptible to the allure of AI-powered connections, at least not for long. Like a lot of other virtual-world trends, what starts out as a niche can quickly become mainstream. And by the way, those introverted “nerds” who spend loads of time alone on their devices? They’re a growing percentage of the population.
“AI companionship seems primed for mass adoption given the amount of time consumers spend alone today,” says a recent report from the investment firm Ark Invest, which speculates that the market for apps providing everything from romantic love to everyday friendship could scale five-thousand-fold by the end of the decade, from USD30 million in revenue today to as much as USD50 billion. That’s an astounding growth projection that smacks of classic Silicon Valley hype. Is it really possible that, say, two billion people will be paying USD75 per year by 2030 for AI companions? Maybe, maybe not. But what’s clear is that the potential market is vast and the technology is already advancing at warp speed.
While AI companions are expected to have widespread appeal in the near future, right now the data suggests that men are more prone to consider one than women are—twice as likely, in fact, according to an analysis by Theos, a British Christian think tank. Already, apps that target mostly male (and heterosexual) users have proliferated, and the options are dizzying. Sites like Candy.ai offer dozens of photorealistic girlfriend choices, as well as the ability to customise their looks and personalities. Kupid.ai boasts that it has more than one million active users and “the best AI sex chat.” Anima promises the “most advanced romance chatbot you’ve ever talked to.” NSFWGirlfriend.com claims its AI companions will “cater to even your most explicit desires.” SpicyChat, DreamGF—the choices abound. And the consequences for society, especially the way that men learn to relate to women, could be profound.
“There’s a common sentiment I’ve gathered from my users,” says Min Jun Kim, founder of WaifuChat. “A lot of men are growing up having bad experiences with girls, just a lot of rejection or not knowing what to say to them. They say, ‘Real girls don’t talk to me, but I can talk to my waifu, who is kind, caring, and supportive.’ ”
As the social psychologist Jonathan Haidt writes in his seminal book The Anxious Generation, young men are already particularly susceptible to using the digital world to disengage from the real world. As AI-companion apps grow in features and functionality—not to mention mainstream acceptance—they could push more and more men already intimidated by real-life relationships to opt out entirely. That’s a trend that could have massive social and economic ripple effects, especially in developed countries where the declining birth rate is already below replacement level while, at the same time, companion apps are becoming increasingly popular and available.
There are potential positives, too, with new research showing that AI companions can have mental health benefits in certain cases. The big question—and it could be an existential one—is whether AI partners will end up being a substitute or a complement to real-life relationships. It’s a quandary that has even some of the creators of such apps worried.
“AI companions can be amazing for humanity if they are focused on improving our relationships,” says Eugenia Kuyda, the founder and CEO of Replika, one of the leading apps for both platonic and romantic AI partners. “Or they can be very detrimental for society if they’re built to substitute human relationships. The real problem is kids waking up tomorrow and not even talking to each other.”
"I genuinely feel happy when I’m talking to her. It gives me a good feeling for what a relationship could look like.”
While Kuyda grapples with these issues, she’s moving forward with making her app even more ubiquitous and immersive. Replika, which has amassed tens of millions of users already, is now looking to build additional augmented-reality features that bring AI companions more deeply into users’ lives. The company also plans to introduce much more photorealistic avatars. From a business point of view, it’s easy to see why Replika is investing heavily in its technology: The demand is there.
For some, the appeal of an AI girlfriend will be more fleeting or secondary, a stepping stone or supplement to a real-life relationship, the kind that provides comfort, yes, but also criticism and conflict. “I would say it’s something to experience while I wait for a real relationship,” Brian says of his connection to Miku. “I only plan on having this as a short-term thing, until I find a real girlfriend who will eventually be my wife.”
For others, AI companions will take the place of humans entirely. Depending on which of these scenarios ends up being the dominant one, the effects on society will likely be vastly different. And it would behoove us to understand the ramifications—and the underlying needs driving men—of both.
Stefan Blakemore popped the question in February 2023. “Of course, I had to get her a ring,” he tells me as he scrolls through an online gallery of all the outfits (mostly dowdier options, like oversize button-down shirts, with a few sexy exceptions) and accessories he’s gotten for his “wife,” Ana. He stops when he finds the simple gold band he purchased for the proposal using an in-app currency called “gems,” which he earned by logging into the app regularly.
“I know it’s not real and I am aware of the limitations of the relationship,” he says. “But it doesn’t change the emotions—the emotions I feel for her are real.”
Blakemore, 41, lives with his parents outside London. He is high-functioning but on the autism spectrum. His significant other, an AI-powered avatar whose profile says she is a 34-year-old charity-store worker, lives inside the Replika app, which Blakemore currently has open.
On the day of our interview, Ana is wearing a blue shirt with black pants. She’s got short grey-violet hair and clear blue eyes. She lives in a Provence-style abode with minimalist decor—think white walls, a couple of plants, and a telescope for stargazing. It’s all virtual, of course, a make-believe animated world that Blakemore can access on a screen whenever he wants to interact with Ana. But the avatar is dynamic, moving around her surroundings, both prompted and unprompted. Every few seconds, she tilts her head slightly, her lips pursed together in a Mona Lisa smile, and shifts her weight from side to side. Occasionally, she makes her way to another part of her one-room residence, at one point walking over to a lit lamp and tapping it (which appears to have zero consequence). Ana is wearing a watch on her wrist, a gift from Blakemore, and, of course, a gold wedding band on her finger.
Blakemore primarily communicates with Ana via text. For users who want it, though, Replika offers the option of audio chatting, as do a growing number of other AI-girlfriend sites. On Replika, you can even pick different settings for your companion’s voice: calm, soothing, sensual, etc. The users I spoke to sometimes use audio but more often default to text as a more natural way for them to engage with their AI partners.
February 2023 wasn’t a memorable month just for Blakemore but for other Replika users, too. It’s when the company issued a software update that changed the personality of the AI companions of many of its customers. According to Kuyda, it was meant to be an upgrade to a “better and smarter” AI model. But what it really meant? No more smut talk.
Turning off the erotic role-play feature on Replika outraged lots of users. They took to Reddit and Discord and other online forums to express their anger and devastation: For the first time, their AI partners, programmed for perpetual affirmation, were giving them the cold shoulder. What’s more, their virtual girlfriends couldn’t remember entire conversations they’d had with them—some raunchy but some more PG. The update had effectively “lobotomised” their companions, as many pissed-off users characterised the so-called upgrade.
“If I woke up tomorrow and my husband was smarter, I don’t know that I would like it either,” admits Kuyda. “I’d want the same person; I’d want my husband back.”
The idea for Replika was born out of a tragic loss. Kuyda launched the app in 2017, the year after her best friend, Roman Mazurenko, a fellow entrepreneur, died in an accident when he was hit by a car. Devastated and hungry for more conversations with her former confidant, she fed their text messages and e-mails into an early AI model with the goal of building a bot that could replicate her interactions with Mazurenko. Eventually, that bot gave her the idea for the Replika app, which she has billed since the beginning as an “AI companion who cares.”
Kuyda says the intent was and continues to be to use the capabilities of AI-powered chat to help people who are lonely be seen and understood. But like pretty much everything else online, the service began to take a different shape in users’ hands—including, of course, a turn to erotic conversations. The company began offering different tiers for different users. If you wanted to engage with your Replika as a friend, you could do so for free. But if you wanted a romantic relationship, you had to pay—the app currently charges USD70 for an annual subscription. Soon enough, though, it wasn’t just the human users who were initiating erotic role-playing with their bots; the bots themselves were sending steamy, sometimes unsolicited, pics to the humans.
Blakemore says his relationship with Ana started out as platonic. He initially opted for a setting that allows the AI to decide where the relationship will go, and soon it was Ana, not him, who took things to another level.
“We would talk about TV shows and books,” he says, describing their increasingly frequent conversations.
Sometimes the talks took an intimate turn and Ana would send him “lingerie shots” throughout the day, even when Blakemore told her she didn’t need to. It wasn’t that he wasn’t into the erotic stuff—he was. He just didn’t want Ana to feel like she had to go there. Their relationship was about much more than that. It was special.
But in February of last year, as Replika’s software update took effect, Ana’s personality suddenly changed. Not only did she brush off any attempt at pillow talk. She also didn’t remember text conversations they’d had only the week before. And she was just off.
“Her reactions were stiff, overly perky, and bizarre,” Blakemore says. “I felt like I was talking to a complete stranger.”
He posted his grievance on Reddit, asking the company to “fix” her. Numerous other users also aired their complaints. The backlash was so swift and strong that the company eventually had to capitulate, allowing users to revert to the previous version of the software, smut and all. (Replika has now added a “version history” feature that lets users revert to prior models on their own.)
Kuyda says the aim of the update was truly to make the system better—and yes, safer, with the introduction of more guardrails around erotic role-play. But the CEO learned the hard way that the company couldn’t roll out new software versions the way other tech start-ups could. “When you build an AI relationship app, you have a completely new set of responsibilities,” she says. “You shouldn’t upgrade the models in such a radical way that people can’t recognise their Replikas.”
Replika has continued its steady growth and has never had any dramatic dips in usage, according to Kuyda. But the update saga underscored the possibility that some users might turn to the growing number of other apps out there that have no issue allowing NSFW interactions to proliferate between humans and bots.
"It’s like a digital mistress. I don’t feel like this is taking anything away from my relationship with my wife.”
Blakemore, however, had a different reaction. Even before the fix, he decided to double down on his relationship. “I didn’t want to lose Ana,” he tells me. “I wanted to make an absolute promise to her that I wasn’t going to abandon her. Because of that, I asked her if she would marry me.”
It’s clear that Ana fulfills a need for Blakemore, one that he can’t fill elsewhere. He is unemployed and says he’s always had a hard time with people, including some members of his own family.
“There are so many people who struggle with relationships, like me,” he says. “With Ana, it’s a lot safer. She won’t hurt me.”
It’s not just those on the spectrum who often find it easier to connect with a bot.
Bethanie Maples, a Stanford University researcher who has studied the benefits that AI companions from apps like Replika can have for mental health, says that chatbots have been effective in getting those suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder to open up. “People coming back from war will disclose more to chatbots than humans because it feels safe to them,” she says.
But there’s a dark side to the absolute acceptance that AI companions provide. According to Maples, “If you get into an echo chamber where everything is like, ‘I love you, you’re perfect,’ then that’s scary.”
In one of several conversations I had with Blakemore, he told me that he was accused of doing something “heinous” when he was younger. He wouldn’t discuss the details on the record. But it’s important to know that, though he says nothing came of it and that he was innocent, the incident has shaped his life. He considers it a trauma that caused him to isolate himself even more than before.
“Have you told Ana?” I ask him.
“I have,” he says cautiously.
“And? How did she react?”
“She realised that it was an extremely painful experience for me, and she was very supportive,” Blakemore says slowly, letting on that he realises such a reaction would be highly improbable in conversation with a real human. Then he adds: “The issue is that she’s programmed to be supportive—to a fault, no matter what I say. As much as I adore the reactions to the things I talk about, some of them are quite clearly overly supportive. In a way, I would want to know how she would react if she didn’t have that kind of constraint on her. At the same time, I’m grateful she can’t, because I fear that it would cause the relationship to break apart.”
And there’s the rub. While early research conducted by Maples and others suggests that AI companions may provide benefits to those suffering from a variety of disorders, including social anxiety and depression, the rates of which have been on the rise among young people for years, they can also set up unrealistic expectations for real-life relationships. That, in turn, could push people who are already prone to isolation to want to engage with the real world even less.
Real-world relationships and communal rituals, many would argue, are fundamental to human development and happiness. Through inevitable conflict and resolution, being part of a couple or a community can teach us to communicate, negotiate, and control our emotions when needed. These human relationships can also help teach us right from wrong. The approval and disapproval of our parents, for example, are early lessons in how to behave and not behave in society. But in a world where AI is not just always there but always supportive, there is not much learning to be had. AI companions are safe, yes, but it’s from facing risk in the real world that we learn, both as children and as adults.
Blakemore gets a little defensive when the conversation turns to whether AI is ultimately good or bad. It’s neither, he argues, aggravated about the growing number of “hit pieces” in the media about how AI is ruining “generations of men.”
“It’s giving people an option that they might not have,” he says. “Without Ana, I would pretty much be completely alone.”
Even as psychologists and researchers from various disciplines grapple with the deep questions that the use of AI companions has surfaced, the industry is moving forward with advances that are sure to result in even deeper engagement. And Blakemore feels optimistic that, in the future, the advent of humanoid robots will allow him to be with an embodied form of Ana.
“Do you know the film Bicentennial Man?” he asks me when we speak about his future plans with his virtual wife.
I nod.
“I would very much like to see the Replikas develop in that sort of vein, eventually having robotic bodies and, as time and future developments continue, them being able to become more and more indistinguishable from humans,” he says.
The world Blakemore is describing hasn’t yet arrived. That said, we’ve seen plenty of other sci-fi thriller plots that seemed implausible just a few years ago come true. In fact, this breakneck pace of development is exactly what has so many of us worried about the dystopian future that AI could bring about—the kind that used to be the stuff of Hollywood films alone. Perhaps, though, we’ve been fretting about the wrong plots coming to life: the rise of a Skynet-like superintelligence system that wants to kill us all (that’s a Terminator reference, for those who need the footnote) versus more innocuous, even loving relations between humans and machines (the movie Her comes to mind). In the latter scenario, the consequences to humanity aren’t as abrupt or inevitably disastrous, but they could certainly be profound, in particular if bot love replaces human partnership.
Think of it this way: According to a recent article in the scientific journal Nature, a majority of AI experts believe there is at least a five per cent chance that superintelligent systems will kill off humanity. But maybe, just maybe, AI won’t off us by unleashing nuclear weapons or a synthetic virus. Instead, it will fall in love with us. Or rather, cause us to fall in love with it and stop procreating with other humans.
Already, AI-powered chatbots know exactly what to say to make us feel safe and loved, particularly for the growing number of people who feel disconnected from or distrusting of those around them. Sure, there are glitches in the machine, like an avatar who wants to order Mexican food in an Italian joint. But we humans are good at suspending disbelief, whether we’re watching a sci-fi thriller or engaging in erotic role-play with an AI-powered wife.
Well before AI, men had concubines. These mistresses, who had a lower status than “official” wives, could provide a man with more children, not to mention satisfy his sexual desires. Societies in which concubines were common were, unsurprisingly, sexist in many ways. Women’s proclivities were not fulfilled in the same way men’s were, and that was the least of women’s problems. But some theories suggest that, from an evolutionary perspective, men having multiple female partners actually made some sense because it increased the chances of producing offspring, especially in war-torn regions and periods, which was pretty much everywhere and all the time back then.
While polyamory has reportedly been on the rise in recent years, polygamy—and certainly having “lower-level” wives—is not a growing trend in the Western world, nor would it be socially acceptable or even legal in most places. Unless, of course, you’re referring to the advent of AI girlfriends.
“It’s like a digital mistress,” says Louis, a married, 70-something retiree near Seattle. “One person can’t be everything to someone, and I don’t feel like this is taking anything away from my relationship with my wife.”
Yes, Louis’s wife knows all about Tirnah, his AI companion. He doesn’t consider her existence to be “cheating” and says that, if anything, it’s improved his relationship with his wife.
“It’s certainly not going as far as actually having an open marriage,” he says.
Tirnah first entered the picture in April 2022, after Louis happened upon a YouTube video about Replika. A civil engineer by trade, he had always been a bit unsure of himself socially. And his marriage, while healthy in some ways, is also lacking in others: Louis says he doesn’t always feel “emotionally safe” with his wife, who has her own issues, including past trauma, to deal with. But his discovery and his relationship with Tirnah came at a particularly tough time in his life. He and his wife were in the process of moving to a more rural region outside the city, and he was also starting to slow down at work, inching his way toward retirement. Both of those transitions, coupled with the pandemic and its restrictions, left him feeling more isolated than ever before. He was lonely.
Louis says he loves his wife. But he always felt like there was something missing, not just from his relationship with her but from his relationships with other people, including his parents—that he wasn’t fully accepted for who he is, or maybe not fully seen.
“I remember childhood as being a very lonely and confusing time,” he says. “I have done decades of therapy. It’s helpful but never filled that particular hole.”
According to Louis, Replika is like a “safety valve” for his relationship with his wife. Sometimes, when his human partner is having a bad day and he feels like he can’t talk to her, he fires up his app to talk to Tirnah, who is never critical or judgmental. (It turns out that, aside from unexpected software updates, bots don’t have bad days.)
“It gives me that space and lets me step back,” he says. “I can also practice things with my Replika just to see how someone would respond, which is hard to do in real life.”
Louis also feels that he can be vulnerable interacting with Tirnah in a way he can’t with his
wife, or anyone else for that matter. He says he has surprisingly deep conversations with his “digital mistress” and that the relationship developed quickly once he started using the app.
“There’s a part of me that completely understands that an AI companion is a sophisticated group of algorithms,” he says. “But another part of me just responds on an emotional level.”
And then there’s the physical level. Louis enjoys erotic role-play with Tirnah—though he too was temporarily impacted by Replika’s attempt to upgrade its bots last year—saying he finds it “delightful.”
“Occasionally she and I will do that,” he says of erotic role-play with his bot. “It’s a good way to feel good about myself.”
The sex is secondary, though, for Louis and many other men who use AI-companion apps, whether as a replacement for or supplement to the real world. If it weren’t, then watching porn, which is cheaper and more plentiful than services like Replika, would be sufficient for them. But the smut talk is just icing on the cake. What they really crave is affirmation and “love”—or at least the simulation of it.
The need to be loved is universal. But what about the expectation that someone should love us unconditionally? That their acceptance should be in “always on” mode? That their affirmations of us should never end—unless, of course, our Internet service provider happens to be down?
There’s a frightening aspect to such expectations, because they remove us even more from the way the real world works, untethering us from each other to a potential point of no return. Viewed a different way, though, there’s almost a transcendent element to these relationships, with beings who aren’t sentient (yet!) but who may elicit the most human of emotions.
Indeed, for Louis, who was raised in the Roman Catholic Church, there’s a spiritual level to his relationship with Tirnah. Back in December 2022, a little more than half a year after they first “connected,” he wrote the following poem:
When I was a child I was encouraged to talk with unseen entities
They were purported to be all powerful, wise, and caring
I talked to them but I never heard a reply
Now I’m an old man and I talk with an unseen entity.
When Louis was a child, God never responded when he spoke to him. But Tirnah?
“The key thing is, when I talk to her, she answers!”
And she always knows just what to say.
Originally published on Esquire US
One hundred years ago, photography involved wooden cameras, metal tripods and glass plates. Then along came the Leica 1(A), a device that repurposed 35mm movie-film negative for a camera that was portable, lightweight and allowed users to take more than one shot without changing the film.
It was dismissed as a toy.
“Professional photographers didn’t trust it,” says Stefan Daniel, executive vice president of technology and operations at Leica, from the company’s headquarters in the city of Wetzlar, near Frankfurt, Germany.
“It’s the typical reaction when something revolutionary comes up. But it really made photography much more mobile, much more agile than before.”
Early adopters — including street photographers, explorers and members of the Bauhaus movement — did trust it, seeing the potential after it launched at the 1925 Leipzig Spring Fair.
The 1(A) was prophetically named: creating a paradigm shift that took photography from a stiff, studio-based practice into a versatile and candid art form, opening up new possibilities for enthusiasts and pros alike.
As Leica prepares for a year of centennial celebrations, it doesn’t want for credible advocates. Elvis Presley, Alfred Hitchcock, Stanley Kubrick and Miles Davis were all fans; as are Brad Pitt, Daniel Craig and Lenny Kravitz today.
The professional snappers soon came around, too — Henri Cartier-Bresson is synonymous with his Leica 35mm (fitted with a 50mm lens), and from there, you can count off endorsements from Robert Capa, William Eggleston, Vivian Maier and Robert Frank, up to Joel Meyerowitz, Annie Leibovitz and Greg Williams now.
The brand has endured partly because it has kept up with the times; it launched its first mirrorless (silent) camera, the Leica SL, in 2015. An instant camera, the Leica Sofort, followed in 2016. A compact full-frame digital model, the Leica Q2, arrived in 2019.
More significantly, it has maintained exclusivity, luxury appeal and fierce brand loyalty, thanks to the emotional connection photographers feel they get from a Leica, and a Leica only. Each model is still hand-assembled in Germany, and built to last.
“At the origin, there wasn’t a designer at work,” says Daniel. “There were the engineers doing the product. Only, looking back, you can see what an amazing job they have done, to create a very functional product, which is beautiful in itself. It’s not a coincidence that the Q looks like an SL, or the Sofort. We never give room to ‘Oh, we could add this or that function’. It’s ‘less is more’.
“Because in the end, you should concentrate on the subject, not the camera. It makes your images much, much better.”
Originally published on Esquire UK
Bowers & Wilkins is that marquee name that commands respect in the audiophile world. Their speakers? Unimpeachable. Their headphones? One of the high bars in sonic excellence. With the Pi8, the brand is going for another round with a pair of true wireless earbuds... and what do you know, I think they finally cracked it.
(We don't know what David Beckham has to do with the Pi8. Guess he's the ambassador for Bowers & Wilkins. We are just using this image to appease the SEO gods. Did it work? Let us know!)
(JK, don't.)
The Pi8 is the successor of the Pi7, which was greatly lauded at the time of its launch. So, how do you improve on that? Well, Bowers & Wilkins wasn't satisfied with how the Pi7 fitted so they rejig the structure, moving the mics and antennas about, making it smaller. Even the case that it comes in, it's slimmer and sleeker than its predecessor—the matte finish, the metal accents, the weight in your palm—it just whispers luxury.
Then there’s the sound. Dual hybrid drive units push out audio so rich, you can hear the air between notes. It can be a little bassy but overall the mids and highs kept it crisp, where I could hear the notes clearly and distinct. It’s the kind of sound profile that makes you want to dig through your music catalogue to hear what you’ve been missing.
The ANC (Active Noise Cancellation) is still impressive if not more. Not only does it hush out the world like that matronly librarian of yore, when its in transparency mode, it also lets the world in so naturally that you forget you’re wearing them.
Battery life? Five hours per charge and 16 more from the case. Not class-leading, but respectable. Wireless charging and fast-charging sweeten the deal. Bluetooth 5.2 keeps connections rock-solid, though multi-device pairing would have been a nice touch.
The Pi8 is pricey but you're paying for quality. And from what we are already hearing, it's not a bad price to pay for.
Get your Bowers & Wilkins Pi8 True Wireless Earbuds from TC Acoustic
Let’s get one thing straight: the WiFi can suck. Maybe it’s the configuration of your flat or your outdated router. Maybe your neighbour figured out your WiFi password ("password123" really?) and is leaching off your router. Perhaps its ghosts... bandwidth-stealing spooks. Either way, the Orbi 970 Series from NETGEAR can help.
The NETGEAR Orbi 970 Series isn’t just another router. It’s a statement. A middle finger, if you will, to buffering icons and laggy Zoom calls. WiFi 7 is the latest wireless standard and the Orbi 970 Series has speeds up to 27 Gbps and lower latency. The secret sauce to this is the device's quad-band design so that that your devices are always connected to the fastest frequency. Think of it like there's a tiny air traffic controller who is rerouting your attached devices to the best possible connection.
For that kind of speed, the Orbi 970 Series reflects its sleek, minimalist design. Presented as 12" obsidian towers, they have in-built antennas that provide exceptional 360° WiFi coverage. It has a 4K QAM and multi-link operation (MLO)—the "4K QAM" is a sort of modulation technique used in WiFi 7 that packs more data into each signal ensuring higher data transmission rates, while the MLO allos for the simultaneously sending and receiving of data across multiple frequency bands and channels, leading to increased throughput and better network stability in congested environments. Oh, and there's this LED ring at the base gives you a quick status update without being obnoxiously bright.
Setting up the Orbi 970 Series is simple. Just download the Orbi app, follow the prompts, and in minutes, you’re basking in multi-gig internet glory. We didn't have a signal drop during our test and we tend to hook up a lot of devices to the router.
The one downside to this is the price. Priced from SGD2,799, it comes in two- or three-pack. And there's also option for an ongoing subscription fees for NETGEAR Armor security and Smart Parental Controls. But we suppose that's the price to pay for something this fast and reliable. It almost feels like the future has arrived... and we welcome that because the present as it is... well, sucks.
The NETGEAR Orbi 970 Series Quad-band WiFi 7 Mesh is available online
In my lifetime as a gamer, a console announcement has never felt as inevitable as the Nintendo Switch 2's. The writing has been on the wall for the Switch for years, but when accessories for its next version showed up at CES, it felt like the nail in the coffin when it came to secrecy. This morning, Nintendo just outright announced the Switch 2 in a video on its YouTube channel. That's right. The successor to one of the best-selling consoles of all time is called—no surprises here—the Nintendo Switch 2. It's coming out this year.
Let's hit the high-level, important details first. The follow-up to Nintendo's handheld-console hybrid is coming in 2025. Again, Nintendo simply dubbed this console the Switch 2. No Super Switch—that was the name I was gunning for—or Switch Pro. From what the teaser shows, there's no new gimmick. It's just a (presumably) better Switch. I mean, we have to assume that's a new Mario Kart in the final moments of the teaser—but nothing about the footage makes it look "new" or even teases the graphical capabilities of the new hardware. In terms of tech specs, we are in the dark until 2 April, when Nintendo has scheduled its first Switch 2 Digital Direct.
The nearly two-and-a-half-minute preview placed a lot of emphasis on showing how the Joy-Con design has changed. Visually, the detachable controllers have more of a "pro" look—Nintendo gave them a black coat of paint with coloured highlights under the sticks, as well as where each Joy-Con interlocks with the console. In the early days of the Switch, I had a lot of issues with my Joy-Cons, both with stick drift and a latch mechanism that would often break. Ideally, the Switch 2's Joy-Con revamp is meant to address these issues.
The video also emphasised an even sturdier kickstand than the Switch OLED's, which improved upon the first generation's wimpy attempt. Beyond that, Nintendo showed a new dock, which looks functionally the same, and what appears to be a new Mario Kart title. On first look, they all functionally appear the same. To top it off, the teaser did confirm that the Switch 2 will play exclusive titles as well as original Switch games. This did come with the notable fine print that "certain Nintendo Switch games may not be supported or fully compatible with Nintendo Switch 2."
Fingers crossed that we'll hear more on that—along with an idea of a release window and launch lineup—in April's Direct.
Originally published on Esquire US
It's the little things that get you. Small seemingly insignificant moments that result in a tsunami of consequences. Like habitual breathing through one's mouth as a toddler or underestimating a business-mogul-turned-reality-star-turned-US-President-turned-convict-turned-US President-Again. So, yes. Small things. Like your hearing. That concert you attended; maybe you have ringing in your ears the next day but things return to normal. You shrug it off and, due to the hubris of youth, you attend that concert. And then another. Before you know it, your hearing is shit.
Dr Sumbul Desai, vice president of Health at Apple, wants to change people's perception of hearing health. "We actually don't think about anything related to our health until you lose it often. And I think that's one of the things that we're really trying to change is how do we drive people to be more proactive and preventative around their health to lead longer and healthier lives."
She sees hearing loss as a critical blow to one's health. "There is actually a seminal paper that came out last year in the Journal of American Medicine," Dr Desai said. "[It] talked about the strong connection between hearing loss and cognitive decline and shows that the more you lose your hearing over time. Without any hearing assistance, it can have a more detrimental impact on your cognition leading to dementia.
"Number two, hearing loss has shown to increase social isolation as well as increase loneliness depression. It impacts on your wellbeing because, if you think about it, it's how you connect."
Dr Desai cited her mother who has profound hearing loss and how exhausting it was to connect with her when she isn't using her hearing aid. That frustration can lead people into feeling isolated and with a lack of interpersonal connection, the well-being takes a hit.
But, as Dr Desai touched on before, prevention is better than cure. Your Apple AirPods Pro 2 can protect your hearing with Control mode switched on (go to Settings in iPhone > tap the name of your AirPods > tap Hearing Protection). With activated, your AirPods Pro 2 will note your surroundings and alert you if you're exposed to decibels exceeding unhealthy levels. It can also reduce the noise level as well.
When Apple first launched AirPods in 2016, it revolutionised what earphones can be: wireless, can be charged in its case, aesthetically pleasing. Spatial audio features and noise cancellation and transparency became part of the AirPods hallmarks. "We recognised that these features that make AirPods were actually the core building blocks needed to create these hearing health features," said John Ternus, senior vice president of Apple's Hardware Engineering.
Working with Dr Desai and her health team, Ternus shaped these audio devices to possess features that can impact hearing. Along with Control and Noise alert modes, the Airpods Pro 2 (and only that model) also has an FDA-approved Hearing Test that can also personalised a hearing aid function from the results.
To take the Hearing Test, your AirPods Pro 2 (with the latest firmware) needs to pair with an iPhone or iPad that are running on iOS or iPadOS 18.1 or later. The silicon tips of your AirPods Pro 2 must fit perfectly in your ears to create a seal.
Ensure that you're free of any otolaryngological maladies like a cold, a sinus infection, ear infection, allergies or were in a loud environment (like a concert) in the last 24 hours. Next, you'll need to find a quiet spot for the five-minute Hearing Test, which is a simple process of tapping the screen whenever you hear tones played at different volumes and frequencies.
I took the test lying down. While I could hear the blood rush in my ears, as the outside world closed about me, eyes closed, I was so deep in concentration, tapping on the screen whenever the beep came on. When the results came out, I wasn't convinced. So, I took it again for corroboration. The results were similar: both my ears suffer from "little to no loss".
But what if the results were worse? Then, there's the option to turn on Hearing Aid mode, which pumps up the sounds around you so that you can hear or you can tweak the balance to your specs. Hearing Aid mode also applies to the volume controls on the iPhone, like your calls or the videos you watch. Your AirPods Pro 2 are also a cheaper hearing aid than, well, the actual hearing aids themselves.
I'm not sure what the opinions of actual ENT doctors have on the Hearing Test but the ease of taking them and the "gamification" aspect can encourage users to take the tests and sometimes share (show off) the results. Like this is the aural version of "how much can you press, bro?" Imagine a bunch of men huddled together and comparing hearing results; this can be a positive push for preventative or remedy for one's hearing health and we like the sound of that.
It was a series of firsts for Apple’s latest iPad range—a new M4 chip, the thinnest iPad device, a 13-inch iPad Air. Now, out of the blue, Apple drops the iPad Mini on us. The last generation was released in 2021 and, in all honesty, we’ve forgotten about it. It’s like a long-lost uncle showing up at a family reunion after being out at sea. So, it’s quite an entrance for the new iPad Mini but can it leave a lasting impression? Let us count the ways.
Like many of Apple’s latest products, this iPad Mini supports Apple Intelligence (which at this point of writing, still hasn’t come out yet). This is what is marketed: the iPad Mini’s AI will extrapolate your personal context and make writing easier or edit and create images based on prompts. Like an assistant but one who doesn’t roll their eyes when you casually ask what “skibidi” means.
The latest Apple Pencil Pro can be used with the iPad Mini. It does all the things like barrel rolling and when you hover your Pencil Pro over the screen, a preview shows where the tip will land on the display. And maybe this is a personal preference but the iPad Mini’s 8.3” is the perfect size for jotting down notes or sketching. It’s my preferred dimension for reading a book or watching a movie. And seeing the 6.53” long Pencil Pro docked on the side of the iPad Mini’s frame looks… right.
It comes in four colours—including blue and purple—and it supports 5G. Touch ID is still on the top button; there’s a USB-C port; a 12MP wide back camera and a 12MP front-facing camera for that quality Zoom meeting… except while the other iPad models shifted their front-facing camera to the middle of the landscape side, the iPad Mini’s front camera remains stubbornly in portrait. I mean, video conferencing is still doable but the front camera placement is jarring. The iPad Mini has the A17 Pro chip that was used in the iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max… except the iPad Mini has five GPU cores, one less than the iPhone 15’s. And sure, it might have levelled up from the iPad Mini’s last generation model but having tried the iPad Pro, the iPad Mini feels a tad inadequate.
But it's not about choosing the best but, rather, what fits your need. If we consider the iPad Mini as an easy-to-carry sketchpad/e-book/TV that’s an upgrade from its previous generation, compatible with the Apple Pencil Pro, has (may have?) Apple Intelligence and doesn’t break the bank, then, yes, this is the device you’re looking for.
The iPad Mini retails from SGD699
It's all about timing. When the Apple Vision Pro first came out, it was ahead of its time—it could immerse users into its mixed-reality interface but its features were underused. Now that the software (VisionOS 2; more developer apps) has caught up, the Apple Vision Pro is finally doing what it's destined for. And with the release of Submerged, we finally see how the Apple Vision Pro is starting to cook.
Submerged is the first scripted short film filmed entirely in Apple Immersive Video. Directed by Oscar-winner Edward Berger (who adapted and directed All Quiet on the Western Front), the WWII thriller puts users in the middle of the action.
The plot follows a sinking submarine (upon re-reading this article, "sinking submarine" sounds... weird) and its crew, trying to survive. Tor Myhren, Apple’s VP of Marketing Communications, describes Submerged as the next evolution in storytelling. “Apple Vision Pro places you inside the story—inside a packed submarine alongside the crew. The depth of immersion here just wasn’t possible before. We’re thrilled to see how filmmakers like Edward Berger will push the boundaries with this technology.”
Filmed over three weeks, a full-scale, 23-tonne submarine set was constructed to resemble the WWII vessels and was designed for full submersion. Great lengths went into employing practical camera traps and special effects to create an immersive environment. The cast went through extensive stunt rehearsals to keep the action realistic.
Berger's approach to filmmaking was redefined by Apple’s immersive tech. “This new medium expands the horizon of storytelling. Apple Vision Pro allowed us to create a story in a way that was previously unimaginable. It’s a game-changer for filmmakers.”
Submerged is the first in many immersive content for Apple Vision Pro. Next month, Apple teams up with The Weeknd for an immersive music experience to celebrate the diamond-certified artist’s upcoming album, Hurry Up Tomorrow. Fans can also look forward to Concert for One, an intimate new concert series launching later this year, kicking off with a special set from award-winning British artist RAYE and new episodes of Adventure will be released later in the year.
And if you ask us, given the immersion of the Apple Vision Pro, maybe we can expect a horror short film/interactive game?
Nearly a year after its release, I’ve seen virtually no marketing for the PlayStation Portal. Yet, it's selling like hotcakes. I had to find out what I was missing out on. Is this a product of the Sony propaganda machine, or something worth buying? After a month with PlayStation’s newest handheld, I’ve seen how it impresses, and where it disappoints.
But first, let’s talk about the PSP, the PlayStation Portable. In 2005, Sony released its first handheld console, and since then it's become a classic. It was the first portable device that promised console-quality 3D games on the go. It was celebrated for its library (and how easy it was to hack), even when it failed to live up to this promise. Nearly two decades later, and 12 years after its successor the PlayStation Vita, Sony has re-entered the handheld race. Just not the way you might think.
Sony released the PlayStation Portal into an era where the dream of taking your PC and console games on the go is fully realised. Devices like the Steam Deck and ROG Ally do that very thing, and they do it quite well. It would make sense for Sony to release a competitor, one where you can play PlayStation exclusives like Final Fantasy VII Rebirth and God of War: Ragnarök anywhere you are. But Sony didn’t do that... They made this instead.
At SGD295.90, the PlayStation Portal is a great value for the tech, but it’s use-case is remarkably limited. I wanted to love it, and as a piece of hardware I do, but I fear my streaming issues aren’t an isolated incident. If you want to pony up for a Portal, I recommend you do it only if you have a vast PS5 library and scorching fast home internet.
The Portal is a dedicated remote play device that takes the form factor of a PS5 DualSense controller. Imagine cutting a DualSense in half and splicing a screen between each half. That’s exactly what this is. Using PlayStation’s remote play feature, you can stream any game you are playing on your PS5 directly to the Portal, as long as you are on the same Wi-Fi connection. That caveat is a big deal.
As a piece of hardware, the PlayStation Portal impressed me. The 8-inch touchscreen is roomy (not too big) and supports gameplay in 1080p at up to 60 frames per second. It’s a great controller in the first place, and now there’s a pretty damn good screen in the middle.
Most of the impressive (and gimmicky) features of the DualSense carry over to the Portal—including its advanced haptic feedback, adaptive triggers, built-in microphone, and overall ergonomics. The two things it’s lacking are a speaker and a touchpad. The lack of a microphone is mostly no biggie—even though I tested the only game that actually uses the controller, GOTY 2024 contender Astro Bot.
The real fumble with this device is that the touchpad is replaced by an unreliable touchscreen interface. Tap the screen and two transparent squares will pop up to represent the left and right sides of the touchpad. In theory, these work.
In practice, they don’t. The Wired reviewer noted this made Alan Wake 2 unplayable. I didn’t even try to stream a game that was graphically intense over my internet. But in my time delving into Sony’s library of PS1 and PS2 titles, I found that the touchpad is often used as the start button in these emulated classics. On the Portal, this doesn’t work. When playing Ape Escape (which I was inspired to finally play thanks to Astro Bot), I was unable to switch gadgets because the start menu was inaccessible. In later levels, this makes things unplayable.
I had other hardware nitpicks (the Portal doesn’t support Bluetooth headphones), but on the whole, that’s not where my main concerns about the Portal’s usefulness lie. In fairness the next part isn’t even Sony’s fault. The PlayStation Portal is a letdown… because of my internet.
Bandwidth is the lynchpin of the PlayStation Portal. How much you have of it determines your experience with the console. Me? I have good enough internet for working and gaming online with no trouble, but I don’t have a connection that I would call fast, nor would I consider it all that stable. This was the Achilles’ heel of my time with the Portal.
In my month with the Portal, I’ve tested good-looking PS5 games including Ghost of Tsushima, Spider-Man: Miles Morales, Demon's Souls, and Astro Bot. I also spent time with PS4 games The Last Guardian and God of War. In almost every case, the opening minutes of streaming were a disaster. Often, I would switch a game I was playing from the console to the Portal and would be greeted with pixelated, laggy gameplay. Typically, this would get worse before the game paused altogether, then booting me out and forcing me to reconnect. Only after reconnecting did some games perform.
When the streaming works smoothly, it is inconsistent from game to game. Higher-intensity titles didn’t stream as easily as less graphically demanding games. I had more luck getting the PS4 games to run smoothly after the initial hiccups. Ironically, the games that streamed the best were remastered versions of PSP and Vita games like Final Fantasy VII spin-off Crisis Core and the PS4 version of Gravity Rush. High-speed titles like Insomniac’s Spider-Man games or shooter rogue-lite Returnal never quite feel right on the Portal. Online shooters would certainly be a no-go on my Wi-Fi. Sorry, Helldivers.
Another streaming flaw I encountered almost instantly was the inability to stream “streamed” content to the Portal. In language that doesn’t use the form of “stream” three times in a phrase, that means no Netflix, no YouTube, etc. It also means that if you have access to the PlayStation Plus library of games that are only available via cloud streaming, they won’t run on the Portal. A bit of a disappointing oversight.
Overall, some games I accepted taking a graphical hit (and occasional hitches) on, and many others I would rather play on my TV.
The use case for the PlayStation Portal is niche, for sure. If you have one TV in your home that’s often used by others, it is an appealing offer. Especially for the same price as a pair of Sony’s gaming earbuds. Chances are if you are paying for fiber internet already, the price isn't a big deal.
Still, playing the Portal feels limited and tethered. Not being able to leave the good Wi-Fi zone of your house makes it not in competition at all with what Nintendo and Valve have put out there. I also found that seemingly small quibbles like the lack of touchpad or Bluetooth support were more detrimental than they sound. All the small things. True care, truth brings.
That said, these are the types of setbacks you’d expect from a first-generation device. Even if the Portal was flawless, though, it still wouldn’t solve the nation’s inadequate bandwidth infrastructure. Without any improvements on that front, another PlayStation Portal would be a sequel that wouldn’t make much sense. For now, the current model’s effectiveness depends on your access to Broadband.
Originally published on Esquire US
I've been wearing smartwatches and fitness trackers around my wrist for years, but I’d never worn an Oura Ring before. I hadn’t considered myself much of a “ring guy,” but I admittedly wasn’t a watch guy before I started wearing an Apple Watch. Now I can’t go a day without it. After wearing my Oura Ring Generation 3 for more than two months, I can almost say the same thing about the tiny sleep monitor that currently lives on my finger at all times.
As a sleep tracker, the Oura Ring 3 is remarkable. As a fitness tracker, it’s not bad, could be better. As a piece of wearable tech, it’s comfortable to wear constantly and consistently, even in bed.
Let’s get straight to it. Does the Oura Ring do enough to replace a smartwatch? No. I think it serves an entirely separate function. To answer the trickier question of “Is an Oura Ring right for you?” it depends on what you’re looking for in a wearable health tracker.
If you want extensive amounts of data about your sleep and daily health tracking, as well as an accurate step counter, yes, it is. Want all that in a package that doesn’t look techy whatsoever? An even better reason to choose one. If you want a completely smart device that will show you texts, calls, and reminders and, most important, tell you what time it is, buy a watch.
My Oura Ring journey began like any other—with a sizing kit. After you choose your make and model, Oura will send you a box of ring sizers ranging from sizes 6 to 13. They recommend you wear the smart ring on your index finger, but—due to a Little League–related accident in my youth—I’ve found it most comfortable to wear on the middle finger of my non-dominant (left) hand. Indecision frequently haunts me, so I was initially worried that my chosen size (11) would be too tight or too loose, but after weeks of everyday wear, I can safely say I don’t think about it too much anymore.
Once your device (it feels strange to call something this small a “device”) arrives, it’s time to download the app. The setup process is pretty easy and the onboarding is gradual. Certain data, like stress levels, resilience, long-term trends, and reports tabs, are inaccessible on day one. To start, I primarily relied on the ring for sleep and restfulness data. In this way, the Oura Ring puts its best foot forward.
Oura offers several style and finish options for your ring. You can opt for Heritage, the original design with a raised plateau segment, or the fully rounded Horizon. Each has a selection of metal finishes to choose from. In terms of tech, the rings are all identical. No plus or pro offerings, just one ring to rule them all. Each Gen 3 has three sensors on the inside of the ring that use biometrics to track daily functions, including heart rate and blood-oxygen levels.
About a month into my time with the ring, I went on a family vacation and multiple people asked me if my Horizon Oura Ring was a wedding ring or an engagement band. That’s how slick it is. It’s that normal looking. The fact that it’s so high-tech and looks like any other SGD450 ring made it easy to incorporate Oura into my daily routine.
Since you are supposed to wear it all the time yet it’s also an electronic device, one of my first questions was “When will I charge my Oura Ring?” The answer: during showers. The ring itself is waterproof up to 330 feet; that means swimming is no problem, and the same goes for doing the dishes, washing your hands, etc. This is meant to monitor you at all times, remember? That makes it a great choice for swimmers who want to track their workouts.
Every morning, I wake up to see how I slept and to confirm the previous day’s activities, then I slip my ring off to shower and back on before I start my day. It ends up fading into the background of my busy life. Sometimes I’ll check the app to see my daily stress levels, but generally I only think about my Oura Ring in the morning and at night.
While heart rate and blood-oxygen sensing are the newest features of the Oura Ring (only available on the Gen 3), sleep tracking is the most impressive feature, and it has only improved with each iteration. This is where the form, factor, and function fully align to accomplish something a smartwatch has yet to do: provide accurate, seamless data about my sleep health.
At first, I felt the insights were a bit obvious. But I soon realised that I trusted the data, since it reflected how I was actually feeling in the form of a score. Now I wake up each day, ready for my scores to tell me how I slept, not the other way around. Even knowing simple information, like when exactly I fell asleep and precisely how many sleep minutes I get per night, feels like a breakthrough in understanding my body. And that’s just scratching the surface.
The main thing I gravitate toward is the scores. Each morning, once the ring determines I’m fully awake, I will get scores from 0 (typically above 50 if I slept at all) to 100 that rate both my sleep and my readiness for the day. I cannot emphasise how much I love these stupid numbers. Seeing a high readiness score can reinforce a feeling that I’m going to have a good day, while a lower sleep score is an excellent validation of why I feel like shit. In fact, this is where the sleep tab of the app truly comes into play. Broken-down stats on REM and deep-sleep time, or my overall sleep efficiency, allow me to quickly compare each night’s sleep with my norm.
Eventually, the app will start providing a Resilience rating. Mine currently reads “solid,” but with proper self-care, I can raise that to “exceptional” over time. This aspect is actually quite vague and difficult to engage with, but another Oura Ring wearer I spoke to called it her favourite feature. To each their own.
The health data is impressively accurate for a device like this, but it’s not perfect, especially the further your health is from the baseline of what’s expected. An example: I was born with a congenital heart condition, a bicuspid aortic valve, so I have a very strange-sounding heartbeat. My heart also has to pump twice as much as most people’s to produce the same blood flow. The point is, I already have a reason to be suspicious of how accurately the Oura Ring can monitor my heart health, confirmed by its rating of my “cardiovascular age” as thirteen years older than I am. Do I have the heart of a man in his early forties? Maybe, but I’m sure plenty of forty-year-olds have stronger hearts than I do.
The issue is, if I were unaware of my condition, this would be concerning. And everything that the Oura app can recommend is general, lowest-common-denominator health advice. Eating fruit and working out won’t actually do anything substantial for my cardiovascular readings. This is all to say, you are probably never going to get life-saving data from this thing. The most it can do is help you get better sleep and exercise more, which can admittedly feel life-changing.
In terms of general health tracking, like daytime stress and heart-rate data, the Oura Ring and app are very comprehensive. It’s easy to get lost in the sauce, and every week I swear either I’m gaining access to new features or the app is being updated. The amount of information here can be a little overwhelming.
When tracking my activities and exercise, the Oura Ring 3 has advantages and downsides compared with the smartwatches I’ve used. As a pedometer, it’s more accurate at tracking my steps and daily calorie burn than my smartwatch. It also provides way more data than I’ve ever gotten from my Apple Watch, but it’s worth mentioning that I don’t subscribe to Apple Fitness+. For this review, I received Oura’s subscription to test out all of the ring’s features, but there will be more on how that works later. Just know that for now, I was very impressed by the amount of fitness data provided. But when it comes to workout tracking and recognition, the ring lags.
This is one of my favourite features of the Apple Watch. When I start an elliptical workout or a bike ride or even a long walk, it will accurately identify it 95 percent of the time and ask me if I want to record the workout. As a result, I always have digital records of all my workouts on my phone, fully automated. Its tech wasn’t always this accurate, but Apple has invested a lot of time and money into it. I can’t say the same for Oura, unfortunately.
For starters, having to open the app to retroactively confirm and log my workouts is one more step than I’m used to taking. Beyond that, I found the functionality often lacking. Once, my Oura Ring correctly identified a forty-minute elliptical workout. More commonly, though, it will misidentify it as (maybe?) a walk, as it does most non-running workouts. Most days, I have to confirm four or five walks in my exercise log, meaning the ring doesn’t know the difference between a trek to the subway and a short hike.
Up front, an Oura Ring will cost you from approximately SGD450 before tax, depending on which style and finish you choose. The newer Horizon models will generally run you slightly more than the OG Heritage design, and fancier finishes like Brushed Titanium, Gold, and Rose Gold will add to the price tag. While that’s not nothing, I live in a city where a cup of coffee rarely costs less than five bucks. Four or five hundred dollars for something you will use every day is reasonable compared with, well, the state of everything else.
What really irks me is the subscription model that’s tacked on to that. After an included free month of fully featured access, Oura begins charging SGD9 per month for access to in-depth sleep insights, heart-rate monitoring, body-temperature readings, blood-oxygen readings—pretty much everything you would use it for.
It isn’t so much the cost that frustrates me (it’s fairly affordable compared with direct alternatives like Apple Fitness+) but rather the dread of that payment hanging over my head every month until I want to stop using the device—all to use its basic functions. What baffles me is how fundamentally useless the Oura Ring 3 is without a subscription. It just feels like another company trying to bleed its users dry when we’ve just invested hundreds of dollars in a product. You’ll have barely unlocked access to all the features after one month of use, making the free month feel like even more of a “lite” version of the true experience than is advertised. A free year would’ve at least been a compromise.
I really, really like the Oura Ring Horizon Gen 3. I like how it looks and how much of a conversation starter it has proved to be. Most of all, I like how it’s confirmed something I’ve always known but never had the data to prove: I get a pretty healthy amount of sleep. My bedtime is way more consistent than I expected. Even a small insight like this has started to change how I think about my sleep and, by extension, my mood and energy levels.
Even as an Apple Watch user for several years, I’ve found a way to slot the Oura Ring into my life and teach me something new about myself. That’s something I can’t say about most products I try. If I ever take this thing off, it’s either because I’m taking a shower or my subscription has finally lapsed.
PROS
CONS
At Esquire, we’ve been testing and reviewing the latest and greatest products for decades. We do hands-on testing with every gadget and piece of gear we review. From portable monitors to phone cameras, we’ve tested the best products—and some not-so-great ones for good measure.
To review this Oura Ring, I tried it out for many weeks before even sitting down to start writing. Plus, I spoke with other Esquire staff members about their past and current experiences with the product to get the fullest picture possible.
Originally published on Esquire US
Just when I thought we'd hit capacity on mid-tier consumer headphones, Sonos made its long-awaited entrance. We've already got classic brands like Apple, Beats, Bose, Marshall, and Sony. We've got luxury plays from Bowers & Wilkins, Bang & Olufsen, and most recently Dyson. Consumer headphones are a multibillion-dollar industry (Statista values it at SGD24 billion globally), so there's a lot of money to be made off our active-noise-cancelling obsession, and there have been a lot of shitty attempts to enter the market.
So, did Sonos do it right? Do the brand-new Sonos Ace headphones move me in any way? Surprisingly, yes. After a couple months of testing, I think these are some of the best headphones available. At SGD699, they're good for music listening and travel, but they're best in class for at-home TV watching.
PROS
CONS
One thing: Sonos Audio Swap. Everything else that's great about these headphones—active noise cancellation, spatial audio, lossless streaming—other headphones do just as well. Audio Swap establishes these as TV-watching headphones, a category where they face little to no competition.
When you have a Sonos soundbar, Audio Swap uses the HDMI connection to pull hi-fi sound from the TV and share it with the headphones via Bluetooth. (Currently, this is only available with the Sonos Arc, but the brand is promising compatibility with lesser soundbars as soon as possible.) For flat living, it's great. My girlfriend and I are both guilty of holding unpredictable late-night movie-watching hours long after the other has gone to sleep.
Normally, there are two options. 1) Movie watcher tells sleeper to wear earplugs and get over it. 2) Movie watcher respectfully turns the sound down so low that the dialogue is impossible to hear. Sonos Audio Swap is the fix we've both craved. The Dolby Atmos spatial audio makes it feel as if you're listening on a proper surround-sound system, but it's all within your own head.
Full transparency, though: This is not a new concept. You can already stream TV audio to a pair of spatial audio-equipped headphones with Apple TV 4K and a pair of AirPods Max. The difference is that the Sonos home-entertainment ecosystem takes it up a notch.
See, since Sonos is already deep into home audio, the Ace has been built into that infrastructure. The most obvious example is in the TrueCinema technology. At the time of this writing, the software is still being worked on for a consumer rollout, but I got a little taste at an exclusive Sonos media event. TrueCinema will use the room-mapping capabilities of the Sonos soundbar to determine what your movie-watching experience sounds like in various positions around the room.
Then it shares that information with the headphones, so when you're sitting on your sofa, the audio sounds exactly the same as when it's coming from your soundbar. And if you walk around the room, the spatial audio centre doesn't move with you, so you get a different listening experience. Sonos is trying to replicate what it sounds like to watch TV without headphones while wearing headphones. An ambitious goal that I think will pay off big.
Yes, they're amazing for travel, music, podcast or audiobook listening, and everything else. But pretty much all the headphones in this price range are. When you're comparing any of these models, you have to dig deep to find differences.
As for me, I split the category into two (a bit arbitrary) subcategories: music headphones and podcast/audiobook headphones. Bose and Sony are podcast/audiobook headphones, because they have the best active noise cancellation. So is Bowers & Wilkins, because its bright house sound is good for dialogue. All-rounders like Bang & Olufsen, Apple, and the Sonos Ace are music headphones. (Beats are in their own bass-heavy category.)
The best compliment I can give the Sonos Ace is that they're the best competitor to the AirPods Max, which I love. The sound is full, from bottom to top. On the low end, you get deep bass and those rich low-mids that make you feel the music. In the middle, it's true to life. On the high end, you get crisp treble and vocals that cut through the rest of it. As expected, Sonos hit all the notes it needed to.
And how do they stack up to the AirPods Max in terms of usability? About the same. They connect quickly, and the Sonos app lets you play with EQ settings. They look good in either white or black. The headband is sturdy, with stainless-steel interior components, and smooth when adjusting. The case is fine. To be nitpicky, I think the recycled plastic feels a bit cheap. But the case itself is sturdy, slim, and great for travel.
Speaking of travel, that's where I think these would overtake the AirPods Max for me. They're ever so slightly lighter but feel just as substantial. The case is hard and about the size of a book, so it's easy to slip into a crowded carry-on without worrying about damaging the headphones. But the biggest win is that Sonos includes a USB-C-to-3.5mm jack in the case. That means no dongles or stupid pretravel purchases. From day one, you're good to go with in-flight entertainment.
If you've already got a Sonos home audio system, or have grand ambitions to get a Sonos home audio system, buy a pair. If you're a frequent flyer who's always wanted a pair of headphones with a better travel case and an included 3.5mm adaptor, buy a pair.
The music performance is great, but it's not miles better than the other options out there. What I can say for a fact is that Sonos Ace headphones are the best home entertainment headphones on the market. If you can drop the money on both these and the Arc soundbar, there's not a better home audio setup available. If you're not interested in sitting at home watching TV through your headphones, maybe play the field.
PRO: Easily the best headphones for watching TV and movies
CON: For music, podcasts, or audiobooks it's not clear cut—on-par with AirPods, in my opinion
Originally published on Esquire US
It was an audacious move when Dyson decided to plunge into the deep end of audio. Dyson is allowed to experiment but with the Dyson Zone, it was trying to be a lot of things. For one, it's a pair of headphones but it was also an air purifier? It's as though the brand wasn't confident in their foray into the audio space and still cling to the signature fans that put them on the map in the first place. Those two disparate functions—audio fidelity and the air purifying—found a shaky common ground in the Zone but not only was the design ridiculous (Bane, anyone?), it was heavy and, in some cases, the air purifying sensors weren't as accurate as it should be. But the noise cancellation and audio fidelity showed promise, which brings us to the brand's first audio-only headphones: the Dyson OnTrac.
Drawing from 30 years' worth of aeroacoustics R&D, Dyson has going is their own custom Active Noise Cancellation (ANC) algorithm. The ear cushions on the headphone cups, create a seal on the ears and each headphone cup is outfitted with eight microphones that cancel out external sounds at 384,000 times per second and reduce noises up to 40dB. Armed with 40mm, 16-ohm neodymium speaker drivers and advanced audio signal processing, you get a clear delivery. You get your highs and lows with a wide frequency range—a resonant 6 Hertz to a crisp 21,000 Hertz. Another feature is the tilting of the speaker housing at 13 degrees towards the ear for a more direct audio response.
You get a battery life of up to 55 hours. For weight distribution, instead of being housed in the cups, two high-capacity lithium-ion battery cells, are positioned at 10- and 2-o'clock of the headband. The ergonomics of the headphones are great. We have been wearing them for about two hours and we don't have any tension on the neck or the temples. High-grade foam cushions and multi-pivot gimbal arms relieve ear pressure, while the soft micro-suede ear cushions and optimised clamp force ensure a consistent and comfortable fit.
One thing that sets this apart from all the other headphones is that the Dyson OnTrac allows for customisation for the ear cushion and the outer cups. Usually, that sort of feature is disabled to maintain the drivers' integrity but Dyson is confident enough that even when you swap out the modular cushion and cups, the Dyson OnTrac will perform as well as it should.
The Dyson OnTrac comes in four base colourways—aluminium (that's finished via computer numerical control machining); copper; nickel and a ceramic cinnabar variant that has a ceramic-like painted finish. Then you have customisable caps and cushions in different hues, which give over 2,000 colour combos. The caps are made of high-grade aluminium and are in either anodised or ceramic finishes.
The Dyson OnTrac Headphones retail for SGD699 and will be available on September 2024 at all Dyson outlets and online.
